Browne v. Dunn

Browne v. Dunn

"Browne v. Dunn" (1893) 6 R. 67, H.L. is a famous British House of Lords decision on the rules of cross examination. From this case came the common law rule known as the "Browne v Dunn rule" or "the rule in Browne v Dunn". The rule in Brown v Dunn says that a cross examiner cannot rely on evidence that is contradictory to the testimony of the witness without putting the evidence to the witness in order to allow them to attempt to justify the contradiction.

The decision arose out of a civil case involving the parties James Loxham Browne and Cecil W. Dunn (solicitor). The case stemmed from a document issued by Dunn on behalf of others addressed to Brown. The document indicated that the signatories, all residents of The Vale, Hampstead, requested Dunn apply for an order against Browne to keep the peace.

At a subsequent Breach of the Peace hearing, Browne became aware of the document and commenced libel proceedings against all parties. During that hearing the document was never shown to any of the signatories by Browne during his cross examination. During the hearing Browne produced the document citing it "a sham". The jury eventually found in favour of Browne and ordered damages of 20 shillings. Dunn appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeal and the verdict was set aside. Browne then appealed to the House of Lords. During that appeal it was discovered that a number of the signatories were present at the original trial and none of them was asked if the document was anything but genuine.

The rule is best described in the judgment of Hunt J in Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation, who observed: [Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 at 16] :"It has in my experience always been a rule of professional practice that, unless notice has already clearly been given of the cross-examiner's intention to rely upon such matter, it is necessary to put to an opponent's witness in cross-examination the nature of the case upon which it is proposed to rely in contradiction of his evidence, particularly where that case relies upon inferences to be drawn from other evidence in the proceedings. Such a rule fo practice is necessary both to give the witness the opportunity to deal with that other evidence, or the inferences to be drawn from it, and to allow the other party the inference sought to be drawn."

Lord Herschell originally explained it as::"... I cannot help saying that it seems to me to be absolutely essential to the proper conduct of a cause, where it is intended to suggest that a witness is not speaking the truth on a particular point, to direct his attention to the fact by some questions put in cross-examination showing that that imputation is intended to be made, and not to take his evidence and pass it by as a matter altogether unchallenged, and then, when it is impossible for him to explain, as perhaps he might have been able to do if such questions had been put to him, the circumstances which it is suggested indicate that the story he tells ought not to be believed, to argue that he is a witness unworthy of credit. My Lords, I have always understood that if you intend to impeach a witness you are bound, whilst he is in the box, to give him an opportunity of making any explanation which is open to him; and, as it seems to me, that is not only a rule of professional practice in the conduct of a case, but is essential to fair play and fair dealing with witnesses."

The practical necessity is obvious, as Wells J noted in Reid v Kerr: [Reid v Kerr (1974) 9 SASR 367 at 373-4] :"... a judge (or a jury) is entitled to have presented to him (or them) issues of facts that are well and truly joined on the evidence; there is nothing more frustrating to a tribunal of fact than to be presented with two important bodies of evidence which are inherently opposed in substance but which, because Browne v Dunn has not been observed, have not been brought into direct opposition, and serenely pass one another like two trains in the night."

The rule has been adopted in most common law countries, including Australia, and it remains one of the primary rules of consideration during cross-examination.

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Thomas M. Browne — Thomas McLelland Browne (* 19. April 1829 in New Paris, Preble County, Ohio; † 17. Juli 1891 in Winchester, Indiana) war ein US amerikanischer Politiker. Zwischen 1877 und 1891 vertrat er den Bundesstaat Indiana im …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Denis Browne (bishop) — Most Reverend Bishop Denis George Browne CNZM, DD (born 21 September 1937) was Bishop of Rarotonga (1977 1983), the tenth Catholic Bishop of Auckland (1983 1994) and is the second Bishop of Hamilton, New Zealand (1994 present). Born in Auckland,… …   Wikipedia

  • Thomas Browne — Infobox Scientist name = PAGENAME box width = image width =150px caption = Portrait of Sir Thomas Browne birth date = October 19, 1605 birth place = London death date = October 19, 1682 death place = residence = citizenship = nationality =… …   Wikipedia

  • Denis George Browne — (* 21. September 1937 in Auckland) ist Bischof von Hamilton in Neuseeland. Leben Denis George Browne empfing am 30. Juni 1962 die Priesterweihe und wurde in den Klerus des Bistums Auckland inkardiniert. Paul VI. ernannte ihn am 21. März 1977 zum… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Dennis Browne — Most Reverend Bishop Dennis Browne CNZM, DD is the current Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Hamilton, New Zealand. Born in Auckland September 21 1937. He received his primary education at St. Michael s Primary school, Remuera and his secondary… …   Wikipedia

  • List of notable United Kingdom House of Lords cases — This page is for notable House of Lords legal cases. pre 1850 * Donaldson v. Beckett , 2 Brown s Parl. Cases 129, 1 Eng. Rep. 837; 4 Burr. 2408, 98 Eng. Rep. 257 (1774) * Wright v. Tatham (1838) 4 Bing. NC 489 : hearsay 1850 1899 * Dimes v Grand… …   Wikipedia

  • Nick Clegg — The Right Honourable Nick Clegg MP Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom …   Wikipedia

  • National Cartoonists Society — The National Cartoonists Society (NCS) is an organization of professional cartoonists in the United States. It presents the National Cartoonists Society Awards. The Society was born in 1946 when groups of cartoonists got together to entertain the …   Wikipedia

  • performing arts — arts or skills that require public performance, as acting, singing, or dancing. [1945 50] * * * ▪ 2009 Introduction Music Classical.       The last vestiges of the Cold War seemed to thaw for a moment on Feb. 26, 2008, when the unfamiliar strains …   Universalium

  • National Cartoonists Society Division Awards — Main article: National Cartoonists Society Contents 1 Current categories 1.1 Advertising Illustration Award 1.2 Animation Award 1.2.1 Fea …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”