McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment

McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment
McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment
Court Court of Appeal
Citation(s) [1996] EWCA Civ 1166, [1995] IRLR 461, [1997] IRLR 353
Case opinions
Waite LJ, Potter LJ and McCowan LJ
Keywords
Contract of employment

McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment [1996] EWCA Civ 1166 is a UK labour law case concerning the scope of protection for people to employment rights. It took the view that an agency worker did have a employment contract for the purpose of claiming for unpaid wages on an employer's insolvency.

Contents

Facts

Mr McMeechan's employer went insolvent, and so he claimed the wages he did not get from the Minister. He had been registered with an agency called Noel Employment Ltd, without a written contract, but with a job description of each assignment. He claimed £105 for four days work. In his contract he agreed ‘to fulfil the normal common law duties which an employee would owe to an employer so far as they are applicable’

The Employment Tribunal held he was not an employee. The Employment Appeal Tribunal overturned the Tribunal. The Secretary of State appealed.

Judgment

Waite LJ held that Mr McMeechan was an employee of the agency for this period and so he could claim from the Secretary of State for unpaid wages.

Each engagement is capable, according to its context, of giving rise to a contract of employment. That was acknowledged in Nethermere

Potter LJ and McCowan LJ agreed.

See also

  • Contract of employment in English law
  • UK labour law
  • UK insolvency law
  • EU labour law
  • US labor law
  • German labour law

Notes

References

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Employment contract in English law — An employment contract in English law is a specific kind of contract whereby one person performs work under the direction of another. The two main features of a contract is that work is exchanged for a wage, and that one party stands in a… …   Wikipedia

  • James v. Redcats (Brands) Ltd — [2007] ICR 1006 is a legal case on the definition of a worker under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. In it the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that lack of mutuality of obligation does not affect the status of being an employee, and therefore… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”