Frothingham v. Mellon

Frothingham v. Mellon
Frothingham v. Mellon
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued Argued May 3, 4, 1923
Decided June 4, 1923
Full case name Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.
Citations 262 U.S. 447 (more)
43 S. Ct. 597; 67 L. Ed. 1078
Holding
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Sutherland, joined by a unanimous Court

Frothingham v. Mellon and Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), were two consolidated cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court rejected the concept of taxpayer standing. The plaintiffs in the cases, Frothingham and Massachusetts, sought to prevent certain federal government expenditures which they considered to violate the Tenth Amendment. The court rejected the suits on the basis that neither plaintiff suffered particularized harm, writing:

We have no power per se to review and annul acts of Congress on the ground that they are unconstitutional. The question may be considered only when the justification for some direct injury suffered or threatened, presenting a justiciable issue, is made to rest upon such an act…. The party who invokes the power must be able to show not only that the statute is invalid but that he has sustained or is immediately in danger of sustaining some direct injury as the result of its enforcement, and not merely that he suffers in some indefinite way in common with people generally.

This case is considered the beginning of the doctrine of standing. Prior to it the doctrine was that all persons had a right to pursue a private prosecution of a public right.[1]

The Warren Court would later carve out an exception to this rule in Flast v. Cohen, but later cases have confirmed that Flast is an exceedingly limited exception to Frothingham's general rule (see Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation).

The doctrine on standing has recently been modified by the unanimous opinion in Bond v. United States[2] in which it was held an individual has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a federal statute under the Tenth Amendment.

See also

Notes

  • Text of Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923) is available from: Justia · Findlaw
  1. ^ The Metaphor of Standing and the Problem of Self-Governance, by Steven L. Winter, 40 Stan. L. Rev. 1371, July, 1988.
  2. ^ Bond v. United States, No. 09-1227, June 16, 2011

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Flast v. Cohen — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Flast v. Cohen ArgueDate=March 12 ArgueYear=1968 DecideDate=June 10 DecideYear=1968 FullName=Flast et al. v. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare et al. USVol=392 USPage=83 Citation=88 S. Ct. 1942; 20 L. Ed. 2d… …   Wikipedia

  • Private rights — In the United States, a private right is one that a private citizen can vindicate in court. Compare public rights. There must be a private right for a citizen to have a claim. To have a private right of action, a citizen must be able to show that …   Wikipedia

  • Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation ArgueDate=February 28 ArgueYear=2007 DecideDate=June 25 DecideYear=2007 FullName=Hein, Jay, et al. (Dir., White House Office of Faith Based and Community Initiatives) v. Freedom from… …   Wikipedia

  • standing to sue — ▪ law       in law, the requirement that a person who brings a suit be a proper party to request adjudication of the particular issue involved. The test traditionally applied was whether the party had a personal stake in the outcome of the… …   Universalium

  • Calvin Coolidge — This article is about the United States president. For the ship, see SS President Coolidge. Calvin Coolidge 30th President of the United States In office August 2, 19 …   Wikipedia

  • List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1953 — 1953 U.S. and Canadian Fellows= * Robert Kemp Adair, Sterling Professor Emeritus of Physics, Yale University: 1953. * Luis Valentine Amador, Clinical Professor Emeritus of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University: 1953. * Maynard Andrew… …   Wikipedia

  • Ford Hall Forum — The Ford Hall Forum is the oldest free public lecture series in the United States. Founded in 1908, it continues to host open lectures and discussions in the Greater Boston area. Some of the more well known past speakers include Maya Angelou,… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”